Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:56:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F9FD1C2B6AE84B68A350F02FE512F0C6EAB1A0CBADA8C68505C3847877E70C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Proposed note criticizes the tweet for misrepresentation while doing exactly that by using quotation marks around words that were not used and could not reasonably be interpreted as such by anyone who reads it, which is remarkably another hypocritical aspect of the post. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zgq8r2p#zn3scxs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818701178433421585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F9FD1C2B6AE84B68A350F02FE512F0C6EAB1A0CBADA8C68505C3847877E70C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722459368080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181870117843342158598F9FD1C2B6AE84B68A350F02FE512F0C6EAB1A0CBADA8C68505C3847877E70C