Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 18:52:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Proposed note criticizes the tweet for misrepresentation while doing exactly that by using quotation marks around words that were not used and could not reasonably be interpreted as such by anyone who reads it, which is remarkably another hypocritical aspect of the post. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zgq8r2p#zn3scxs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818701178433421585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1722451960950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18187011784334215854687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E