Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 22:51:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AF8F8A1BA467BDAE314C5EE7B6C756F2924AAE724CE7D81575994118A9D33C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Proposed note criticizes the tweet for misrepresentation while doing exactly that by using quotation marks around words that were not used and could not reasonably be interpreted as such by anyone who reads it, which is remarkably another hypocritical aspect of the post. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zgq8r2p#zn3scxs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818701178433421585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AF8F8A1BA467BDAE314C5EE7B6C756F2924AAE724CE7D81575994118A9D33C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1722466315410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18187011784334215853AF8F8A1BA467BDAE314C5EE7B6C756F2924AAE724CE7D81575994118A9D33C1