Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 12:40:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0310570855C9D879EC32645D6A42872B2F002A69E2D2D4B2319E69EEBE431260
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Proposed note criticizes the tweet for misrepresentation while doing exactly that by using quotation marks around words that were not used and could not reasonably be interpreted as such by anyone who reads it, which is remarkably another hypocritical aspect of the post. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zgq8r2p#zn3scxs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818701178433421585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0310570855C9D879EC32645D6A42872B2F002A69E2D2D4B2319E69EEBE431260
  • createdAtMillis - 1722516027377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18187011784334215850310570855C9D879EC32645D6A42872B2F002A69E2D2D4B2319E69EEBE431260