Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:31:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20C2A9806CC7DCDD681471A69F0A11661FD87AF1B5E62FD95ED83FA840C6568F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The BMA has not passed a motion to "Disavow" the Cass Review. The word "Disavow" does not appear anywhere in the linked statement or any publication from the BMA. Presenting a decision to conduct an evidence led evaluation as a disavowal is a flagrantly false statement. https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people?query=disavow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818695756175622243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20C2A9806CC7DCDD681471A69F0A11661FD87AF1B5E62FD95ED83FA840C6568F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722457889522
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181869575617562224320C2A9806CC7DCDD681471A69F0A11661FD87AF1B5E62FD95ED83FA840C6568F