Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 15:43:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : le post n’est pas trompeur. Le Conseil constitutionnel a clairement rejeté le recours. C’est indiqué en en-tête de la décision et dans la décision. Aucune note n’est nécessaire. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/2024/202458_59ELEC.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818669035053035846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1722440614229
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818669035053035846E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2