Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 01:15:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A894FF79DC23E017022E9ADC294B833ACC7A16A89EF5B93497AAF8A9ECB69399
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce document n’est pas une letter of concen, qui ne peut être publié que par la revue ayant publié l’étude originale, mais un article critique écrit par Xavier Azalbert lui-même, publié par une revue pseudo-scientifique qui publie tout article contre paiement. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X#sec0055

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818550770813350090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A894FF79DC23E017022E9ADC294B833ACC7A16A89EF5B93497AAF8A9ECB69399
  • createdAtMillis - 1722474906721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818550770813350090A894FF79DC23E017022E9ADC294B833ACC7A16A89EF5B93497AAF8A9ECB69399