Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 08:22:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F343C9DE4BA3059BC852CB037CE9F2344CB5F47BCC9DAA87CF0B212453FCC04
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce document n’est pas une letter of concen, qui ne peut être publié que par la revue ayant publié l’étude originale, mais un article critique écrit par Xavier Azalbert lui-même, publié par une revue pseudo-scientifique qui publie tout article contre paiement. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X#sec0055

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818550770813350090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F343C9DE4BA3059BC852CB037CE9F2344CB5F47BCC9DAA87CF0B212453FCC04
  • createdAtMillis - 1722414126175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18185507708133500905F343C9DE4BA3059BC852CB037CE9F2344CB5F47BCC9DAA87CF0B212453FCC04