Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 14:36:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54B9FB82A51DB8E5FFCA8AB322CBCE86F777568FC6B7140688A8069D3D855651
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce document n’est pas une letter of concen, qui ne peut être publié que par la revue ayant publié l’étude originale, mais un article critique écrit par Xavier Azalbert lui-même, publié par une revue pseudo-scientifique qui publie tout article contre paiement. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X#sec0055

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818550770813350090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54B9FB82A51DB8E5FFCA8AB322CBCE86F777568FC6B7140688A8069D3D855651
  • createdAtMillis - 1722782183888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181855077081335009054B9FB82A51DB8E5FFCA8AB322CBCE86F777568FC6B7140688A8069D3D855651