Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 22:12:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4610CA876A1803976A535A3096B2F9E9A3C51AEE1B2F99119131ADE96194DA0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce document n’est pas une letter of concen, qui ne peut être publié que par la revue ayant publié l’étude originale, mais un article critique écrit par Xavier Azalbert lui-même, publié par une revue pseudo-scientifique qui publie tout article contre paiement. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X#sec0055

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818550770813350090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4610CA876A1803976A535A3096B2F9E9A3C51AEE1B2F99119131ADE96194DA0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722723141756
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18185507708133500904610CA876A1803976A535A3096B2F9E9A3C51AEE1B2F99119131ADE96194DA0C