Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 12:22:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC4AA0024136656BE00A51E4C48C0493E228F9D1791821F749AC86B220C1A033
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence. In other words, there is no evidence for the claim that there is no evidence of bias. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818499163627176017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC4AA0024136656BE00A51E4C48C0493E228F9D1791821F749AC86B220C1A033
  • createdAtMillis - 1722428567914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818499163627176017EC4AA0024136656BE00A51E4C48C0493E228F9D1791821F749AC86B220C1A033