Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 00:22:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B5725CC5D5155CE1A2F230727D2F172DFE49D9568D264417850C3C57B9D97EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence. In other words, there is no evidence for the claim that there is no evidence of bias. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818499163627176017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B5725CC5D5155CE1A2F230727D2F172DFE49D9568D264417850C3C57B9D97EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1722471737277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18184991636271760179B5725CC5D5155CE1A2F230727D2F172DFE49D9568D264417850C3C57B9D97EC