Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 01:50:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 971925DA16385272C8BAFF7E9A79DBDB3959BC1F12093BA36BF75713CE099544
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN this is a journal reporting opinions expressed by policy analysts & researchers. A CN would only be needed if the people quoted had not actually expressed those opinions They're not the only opinions on this topic - if you disagree then comment on the article or post a reply

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818483674016252116
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 971925DA16385272C8BAFF7E9A79DBDB3959BC1F12093BA36BF75713CE099544
  • createdAtMillis - 1733709002833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818483674016252116971925DA16385272C8BAFF7E9A79DBDB3959BC1F12093BA36BF75713CE099544