Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 05:45:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66F605A77ED5CACD6F5A6EA0F26F4914E4DD5BDFC99C4DB4AB17A16B90F4C4D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pas de "letter of concerns" dans l'étude Pradelle Lega https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X#sec0055 "Letter of concerns" publiée dans le fortune journals entre autres par l'auteur de ce tweet, revue prédatrice / de mauvaise qualité https://www.redactionmedicale.fr/2022/05/ne-parlez-plus-de-revues-predatrices-mais-de-revues-de-faible-qualite https://univ-constantine3.dz/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Liste-des-editeurs-scientifiques-predateurs-2021_compressed.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818418229234004314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66F605A77ED5CACD6F5A6EA0F26F4914E4DD5BDFC99C4DB4AB17A16B90F4C4D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1722577529037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181841822923400431466F605A77ED5CACD6F5A6EA0F26F4914E4DD5BDFC99C4DB4AB17A16B90F4C4D9