Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 12:27:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A786FB923951208752A3E18569BBAF2ABF03F22599EF7F24C36C8CF4563B168
Participant Details

Original Note:

Relying as it does on a self-selected sample, the point of this "survey" is not legitimate public opinion research, but rather harvesting respondent emails for fundraising or some other purpose. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email-address_harvesting https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20539517221145371

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818299512814792769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A786FB923951208752A3E18569BBAF2ABF03F22599EF7F24C36C8CF4563B168
  • createdAtMillis - 1723638434598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18182995128147927699A786FB923951208752A3E18569BBAF2ABF03F22599EF7F24C36C8CF4563B168