Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-13 19:22:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07A89CD821F1C73B008B3410984B9FC85E59EE20460DA9341115B4BE3A532DEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Relying as it does on a self-selected sample, the point of this "survey" is not legitimate public opinion research, but rather harvesting respondent emails for fundraising or some other purpose. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email-address_harvesting https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20539517221145371

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818299512814792769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07A89CD821F1C73B008B3410984B9FC85E59EE20460DA9341115B4BE3A532DEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1726255330125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181829951281479276907A89CD821F1C73B008B3410984B9FC85E59EE20460DA9341115B4BE3A532DEC