Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 07:32:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 304FC322834DD3E8B7EB6F5CC95C33D8DCEFCB747A2FC694C64F277F112F57CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

They are not banned. The class review found no evidence of "immense and permenant harm" at all. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818259504460349667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 304FC322834DD3E8B7EB6F5CC95C33D8DCEFCB747A2FC694C64F277F112F57CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1722411163986
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1818259504460349667304FC322834DD3E8B7EB6F5CC95C33D8DCEFCB747A2FC694C64F277F112F57CF