Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 07:52:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F065CD8A3B3CEAE9E31780A802CE23261B244B237C30AF2710D803DE0351850
Participant Details

Original Note:

They are not banned. The class review found no evidence of "immense and permenant harm" at all. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818259504460349667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F065CD8A3B3CEAE9E31780A802CE23261B244B237C30AF2710D803DE0351850
  • createdAtMillis - 1722412355143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18182595044603496670F065CD8A3B3CEAE9E31780A802CE23261B244B237C30AF2710D803DE0351850