Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 13:35:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9ACA46E86F8FCA02A453414D5B4667794860F57A14ACAA19D36F59F4EEF1C569
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN even if the current version would be 60% more performant, it would gain only one place up and still be in the bottom 3.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818239935549227040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9ACA46E86F8FCA02A453414D5B4667794860F57A14ACAA19D36F59F4EEF1C569
  • createdAtMillis - 1722432941222
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18182399355492270409ACA46E86F8FCA02A453414D5B4667794860F57A14ACAA19D36F59F4EEF1C569