Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 17:06:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6F8C8AE381F6CD16952EBCEA9164E231FB446F556DA8F9C0CC216B75EE0CD94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Please note that this article is frequently re-posted by The Economist (even if the article was written in 2021) in an attempt to obtain engagement and views as part of a propaganda campaign as denounced by several users. https://x.com/fleroy1974/status/1817289265472004222?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1817666159438606357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6F8C8AE381F6CD16952EBCEA9164E231FB446F556DA8F9C0CC216B75EE0CD94
  • createdAtMillis - 1723223182337
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1817666159438606357A6F8C8AE381F6CD16952EBCEA9164E231FB446F556DA8F9C0CC216B75EE0CD94