Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 06:50:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F48BC74ABC37058E8606FC45A80CD81FBE7D8EC60AD1C001FA31075F95B6461A
Participant Details

Original Note:

ワクチンの感染発症入院重症死亡予防効果はいずれもランダム化比較試験のメタ解析で確認されていますが https://www.carenet.com/news/general/carenet/56042 その後もオミクロン期の観察研究のメタ解析でも発症重症予防効果は示され↓ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00409-1/fulltext 2価ワクチンの接種の有効性は二価ワクチンの未接種者や全ワクチン未接種者と比べた統制された観察研究のメタ解析でも確認され↓ https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1322396/full https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.10.24301107v1 国内でも完全未接種者と比べた二価ワクチンの有効性↓もXBBワクチンの有効性↓↓も報告され https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230304/k10013998631000.html https://www.tm.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/versus/results/20240228.pdf 際限なく国内外で確認され続けており感染研もネット上の国内のワクチン効果報告がないかのようなネットデマに注意喚起を促しています↓ https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/others/12342-2023-10-30.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1814290683773239372
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F48BC74ABC37058E8606FC45A80CD81FBE7D8EC60AD1C001FA31075F95B6461A
  • createdAtMillis - 1726815029357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1814290683773239372F48BC74ABC37058E8606FC45A80CD81FBE7D8EC60AD1C001FA31075F95B6461A