Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 18:35:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1A4BF821A7B1628DCA35D85C2E06B3F7D40584BFD9CE23010AB33D84AE32E93
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's inaccurate to suggest that restricting access to puberty blockers is "led by evidence". The Cass Review did not find that puberty blockers were unsafe or ineffective, rather that there was "not enough evidence" to confirm this long-term. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1812486079422836892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1A4BF821A7B1628DCA35D85C2E06B3F7D40584BFD9CE23010AB33D84AE32E93
  • createdAtMillis - 1728844529730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1812486079422836892A1A4BF821A7B1628DCA35D85C2E06B3F7D40584BFD9CE23010AB33D84AE32E93