Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 15:28:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EF39B6BB34E16DD837881A3E0A80F7A9DC3374EE496DE46E92AD56C70FD8079
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's inaccurate to suggest that restricting access to puberty blockers is "led by evidence". The Cass Review did not find that puberty blockers were unsafe or ineffective, rather that there was "not enough evidence" to confirm this long-term. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1812486079422836892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EF39B6BB34E16DD837881A3E0A80F7A9DC3374EE496DE46E92AD56C70FD8079
  • createdAtMillis - 1722439719998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18124860794228368926EF39B6BB34E16DD837881A3E0A80F7A9DC3374EE496DE46E92AD56C70FD8079