Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 19:18:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6CC5BFCD3C5663D6611D80A43FE1CA7C2D28E0CB27C20A3B6E9B7830FED476F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's inaccurate to suggest that restricting access to puberty blockers is "led by evidence". The Cass Review did not find that puberty blockers were unsafe or ineffective, rather that there was "not enough evidence" to confirm this long-term. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1812486079422836892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6CC5BFCD3C5663D6611D80A43FE1CA7C2D28E0CB27C20A3B6E9B7830FED476F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1722539891312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18124860794228368926CC5BFCD3C5663D6611D80A43FE1CA7C2D28E0CB27C20A3B6E9B7830FED476F3