Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-13 18:42:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFB5DC950147A5DFC69C562C7F30CB50B5C1BACB35C089F6DB0A3CEE55E73AC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Cass Review does not follow established standards for evaluating evidence and evidence quality. It fails to contextualise the evidence for gender-affirming care with the evidence base for other areas of paediatric medicine. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1812175087782478043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFB5DC950147A5DFC69C562C7F30CB50B5C1BACB35C089F6DB0A3CEE55E73AC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1720896155921
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1812175087782478043EFB5DC950147A5DFC69C562C7F30CB50B5C1BACB35C089F6DB0A3CEE55E73AC3