Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-13 17:59:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The Cass Review does not follow established standards for evaluating evidence and evidence quality. It fails to contextualise the evidence for gender-affirming care with the evidence base for other areas of paediatric medicine. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1812175087782478043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1720893565144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1812175087782478043C7371E65D7DC4A548EFFD4EC1B43354ADE6A07924027603C8886F07D5A0A18D1