Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-12 19:54:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 882550AAEF59E9F4C1786E48A4F0600D331575A6EE2325155174E727DC81444E
Participant Details

Original Note:

“In our view” supersedes mere “opinion” when uttered by a bureaucrat wielding the force of compelled action. In this context “researcher” is euphemistic for “a censor.” https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2023-12-13_en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1811834871397974442
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 882550AAEF59E9F4C1786E48A4F0600D331575A6EE2325155174E727DC81444E
  • createdAtMillis - 1720814072620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1811834871397974442882550AAEF59E9F4C1786E48A4F0600D331575A6EE2325155174E727DC81444E