Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-13 02:25:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DC283B345F530C85F6ABA1120EE460B938DFFC1293F27113CC8197D154F8D56
Participant Details

Original Note:

“In our view” supersedes mere “opinion” when uttered by a bureaucrat wielding the force of compelled action. In this context “researcher” is euphemistic for “a censor.” https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2023-12-13_en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1811834871397974442
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DC283B345F530C85F6ABA1120EE460B938DFFC1293F27113CC8197D154F8D56
  • createdAtMillis - 1720837537277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18118348713979744421DC283B345F530C85F6ABA1120EE460B938DFFC1293F27113CC8197D154F8D56