Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-13 06:45:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 945B8E9DDDDF60FC276F41402561D860DA5A01B1F708EF2704FC6CD5D710A84C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. "In our view"; this post is the finding/opinion of the relevant EU commission, with a long explanation attached. A denial by the owner of entity found to be noncompliant does not make this misleading/wrong; the proposed note is not what CN is for--post it in the replies. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_24_3761

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1811788762206339448
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 945B8E9DDDDF60FC276F41402561D860DA5A01B1F708EF2704FC6CD5D710A84C
createdAtMillis - 1720853150621
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1811788762206339448945B8E9DDDDF60FC276F41402561D860DA5A01B1F708EF2704FC6CD5D710A84C