Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-12 11:38:59 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Lancet does not make any of these claims, nor is this peer reviewed research as implied. This is an opinion and speculative letter which one of the authors has confirmed is purely illustrative and has been greatly misquoted and misinterpreted: https://x.com/EllaTravelsLove/status/1810935906087620795 https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1811718544884719684
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439
createdAtMillis - 1720784339315
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18117185448847196841D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439