Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-13 00:17:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8851A2E77081D472C118C680442AADDEE275E4BAB3EB3D2A3D8FD810380C4684
Participant Details

Original Note:

本件裁判は、原告が印刷会社であり石丸伸二氏が被告であるため、印刷代の不払いについて印刷会社が石丸氏に対して異議を申し立てた裁判である事に注意が必要です。 石丸氏が印刷会社の請求額に異議を申し立てた裁判ではありません。地裁判決、高裁判決を不服として控訴、上告した事を印刷会社への異議申し立てと主張する事は無理があります。 https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/338724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1811132917382594687
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8851A2E77081D472C118C680442AADDEE275E4BAB3EB3D2A3D8FD810380C4684
  • createdAtMillis - 1720829855713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18111329173825946878851A2E77081D472C118C680442AADDEE275E4BAB3EB3D2A3D8FD810380C4684