Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 20:12:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACED1A29D99E27CFE5B8A9C9E1461A0186F51E3F2D75FD63ADCC5B79D8435B17
Participant Details

Original Note:

The story's claim of a 54% decline in piping plover population is misleading and based on outdated, inconsistent data from a 2021 study. Updated studies and 9 years of consistent monitoring using a protocol developed with US Fish & Wildlife Services show no population changes. https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1811120996914757818

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1811130978854916490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACED1A29D99E27CFE5B8A9C9E1461A0186F51E3F2D75FD63ADCC5B79D8435B17
  • createdAtMillis - 1720642333185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1811130978854916490ACED1A29D99E27CFE5B8A9C9E1461A0186F51E3F2D75FD63ADCC5B79D8435B17