Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 14:46:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76A5C6CB3FAEE28C728DD733168D951ADBBA85B3874C1443E8637394DD9AC07F
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤解を招く投稿です。 下記の重要な背景情報が欠けています。 今回の広島高等裁判所の判断では、当事者が「長期間のホルモン治療を受けた後、女性的な体つきになっている」ことが考慮され、例外的に手術なしでの性別変更が認められたものです。 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240710/k10014507081000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1811045741424693526
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76A5C6CB3FAEE28C728DD733168D951ADBBA85B3874C1443E8637394DD9AC07F
  • createdAtMillis - 1720622795509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181104574142469352676A5C6CB3FAEE28C728DD733168D951ADBBA85B3874C1443E8637394DD9AC07F