Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 15:25:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6047FDF8B35FE5D4EEC76C4D97900213122546FA5B787C8648ED20D92580FAB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is in the correspondence section, i.e. a letter written to the journal. It is speculation at best, and takes an existing estimate and simply multiplies it. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810847005289185727
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6047FDF8B35FE5D4EEC76C4D97900213122546FA5B787C8648ED20D92580FAB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1720625102138
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18108470052891857276047FDF8B35FE5D4EEC76C4D97900213122546FA5B787C8648ED20D92580FAB2