Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 09:55:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4749D625C930E28A07FC86F2D8E3FC8D1FB8636AD197FD1A13D8C9168F35CE82
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is in the correspondence section, i.e. a letter written to the journal. It is speculation at best, and takes an existing estimate and simply multiplies it. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810847005289185727
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4749D625C930E28A07FC86F2D8E3FC8D1FB8636AD197FD1A13D8C9168F35CE82
  • createdAtMillis - 1720605315191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18108470052891857274749D625C930E28A07FC86F2D8E3FC8D1FB8636AD197FD1A13D8C9168F35CE82