Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-11 12:36:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6667CEFE71E9CE03F6F1A715768EE3F238AA962423E57D9397F4D2E0FFA08BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - It was struck down because of the way the tax was calculated, and not because of the principle of such a tax (and neither the amount). Therefore, saying that "it's extremely unlikely that it would ever get enected" is false. https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2012/12/29/le-conseil-constitutionnel-censure-l-impot-de-75-sur-les-tres-hauts-revenus_1811406_823448.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810812055466672613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6667CEFE71E9CE03F6F1A715768EE3F238AA962423E57D9397F4D2E0FFA08BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1720701390072
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810812055466672613A6667CEFE71E9CE03F6F1A715768EE3F238AA962423E57D9397F4D2E0FFA08BA