Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 21:36:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A50DEA0EB46AF968D04C516158263A961B729398B5298E5740DADC732C12BBFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author in question was publicly accused of being a bigot because of her gender critical views. Gender critical views are protected in law and as such are not considered to be transphobic. Waterstones statement was correct. https://t.co/vuoQe4Y9sR https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/maya-forstater-v-cgd-2022-judgment-transgender-gender-critrcal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810772872702386326
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A50DEA0EB46AF968D04C516158263A961B729398B5298E5740DADC732C12BBFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1720561011021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810772872702386326A50DEA0EB46AF968D04C516158263A961B729398B5298E5740DADC732C12BBFA