Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 02:46:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A19DA54EA7FE35F0DC7B1828B2BE431708E6613335F7A06FB6B92A9503442AA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post doesn't need any CNs, as it states "...would lean heavily into the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 plans...", and refutes Trumps recent disassociation to Project 2025, which started off because some federal employees refused to comply with his orders to ban Muslims.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810741876796051504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A19DA54EA7FE35F0DC7B1828B2BE431708E6613335F7A06FB6B92A9503442AA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1720579616529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810741876796051504A19DA54EA7FE35F0DC7B1828B2BE431708E6613335F7A06FB6B92A9503442AA8