Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 21:01:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post doesn't need any CNs, as it states "...would lean heavily into the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 plans...", and refutes Trumps recent disassociation to Project 2025, which started off because some federal employees refused to comply with his orders to ban Muslims.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810741876796051504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
  • createdAtMillis - 1720558876146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18107418767960515041AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C