Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 18:06:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8F3DA8114FC1F47D60531DAF2FB4FDE9FA2E0C1C8DBB3BD193F814CC10A5459
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The OP states that there is a need for self-defense that applies even to Justice Sotomayor. Had she not had a marshal defending her, she would still have the same G-d given right to defend herself—as do all people. The point is the juxtaposition of her ruling and the action.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810736540576006485
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8F3DA8114FC1F47D60531DAF2FB4FDE9FA2E0C1C8DBB3BD193F814CC10A5459
  • createdAtMillis - 1720548405286
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810736540576006485B8F3DA8114FC1F47D60531DAF2FB4FDE9FA2E0C1C8DBB3BD193F814CC10A5459