Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 20:53:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP presents as fact the reasons a woman was fired but her only evidence is from the fired woman, hardly an unbiased source. Companies have a vicarious liability for employees discriminating against authors' protected beliefs; there were reasonable grounds for dismissal. https://www.acas.org.uk/discrimination-and-the-law/vicarious-liability

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810692290752438738
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
  • createdAtMillis - 1720558399847
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810692290752438738CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505