Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 09:58:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Waterstones tweet is a statement of fact. There is no evidence that it was incorrect or had anything to do with the employees prior tweet. No note needed. Any disagreement should go in the replies (or quote-tweets if replies are disabled)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810689026816426460
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1720605526679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810689026816426460397C51182FE8196694D5FCDD4CA8292F7B2D42F184EA2526661AA66F455DD4F6