Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 02:08:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B22C30DB423AEDF07D93668EE594810D4CAF4A3332F8A3C360EFCABC976B71C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly not true. The original research from 12 years ago is misinterpreted here. The original post has been circulating social media for several years for engagement farming by people too lazy to do a simple Google search. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592#s4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810403259737321806
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B22C30DB423AEDF07D93668EE594810D4CAF4A3332F8A3C360EFCABC976B71C
  • createdAtMillis - 1720577314516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18104032597373218063B22C30DB423AEDF07D93668EE594810D4CAF4A3332F8A3C360EFCABC976B71C