Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 11:33:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Firstly, this is a social media website, and NOT a news site. Secondly, no one ever said he COULD not, it was said he SHOULD not, but once he put in the type of offer he did he legally had to regardless. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/technology/twitter-musk-lawsuit-reasons.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810397126339473577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1720524802458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810397126339473577CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD