Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 20:15:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C09CF03E50E9EC1555891165369F0115D4CD0B877A2A2E325C209225894C0EFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Firstly, this is a social media website, and NOT a news site. Secondly, no one ever said he COULD not, it was said he SHOULD not, but once he put in the type of offer he did he legally had to regardless. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/technology/twitter-musk-lawsuit-reasons.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810397126339473577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C09CF03E50E9EC1555891165369F0115D4CD0B877A2A2E325C209225894C0EFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1720556116596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1810397126339473577C09CF03E50E9EC1555891165369F0115D4CD0B877A2A2E325C209225894C0EFA