Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 21:40:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C07A342BFF65A8F1CD8CCC052912CC987AFB21C49B848CEB12E4A7235BEC5356
Participant Details

Original Note:

Firstly, this is a social media website, and NOT a news site. Secondly, no one ever said he COULD not, it was said he SHOULD not, but once he put in the type of offer he did he legally had to regardless. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/technology/twitter-musk-lawsuit-reasons.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810397126339473577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C07A342BFF65A8F1CD8CCC052912CC987AFB21C49B848CEB12E4A7235BEC5356
  • createdAtMillis - 1720474819472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810397126339473577C07A342BFF65A8F1CD8CCC052912CC987AFB21C49B848CEB12E4A7235BEC5356