Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 06:02:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Firstly, this is a social media website, and NOT a news site. Secondly, no one ever said he COULD not, it was said he SHOULD not, but once he put in the type of offer he did he legally had to regardless. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/technology/twitter-musk-lawsuit-reasons.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810397126339473577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1720591324796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18103971263394735774A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0