Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 21:59:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1241188A654285B6148CA0CA63E52835EF7B3A6F70BECD12DC8E1AB5B84B017
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although an AI image was used, the candidate did exist and was contacted by Private Eye. Private Eye is known for its in-depth investigative journalism. https://x.com/PrivateEyeNews/status/1810327043827249452

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810374798209663237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1241188A654285B6148CA0CA63E52835EF7B3A6F70BECD12DC8E1AB5B84B017
  • createdAtMillis - 1720475977442
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810374798209663237C1241188A654285B6148CA0CA63E52835EF7B3A6F70BECD12DC8E1AB5B84B017