Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 19:09:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29BC5F4789C75A8DC194AACE043868B4902EA0F957A5E31C590383626D1F9CE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although an AI image was used, the candidate did exist and was contacted by Private Eye. Private Eye is known for its in-depth investigative journalism. https://x.com/PrivateEyeNews/status/1810327043827249452

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810374798209663237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29BC5F4789C75A8DC194AACE043868B4902EA0F957A5E31C590383626D1F9CE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1720465771257
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 181037479820966323729BC5F4789C75A8DC194AACE043868B4902EA0F957A5E31C590383626D1F9CE2