Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 17:35:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FF87900CD31BB3C50E29B66DB2CDDAF4CEB8CD9EDFFFABFAE1CB73990B4FF24
Participant Details

Original Note:

Martin McKee, one of the correspondence letter’s authors, has clarified that the 186k figure is “purely illustrative”, suggesting that it is not based on science or maths: https://x.com/martinmckee/status/1810251590520950808?s=46&t=0c8DWbsLOJJyN9dPf5wI-g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810355353072079071
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FF87900CD31BB3C50E29B66DB2CDDAF4CEB8CD9EDFFFABFAE1CB73990B4FF24
  • createdAtMillis - 1720546526041
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18103553530720790713FF87900CD31BB3C50E29B66DB2CDDAF4CEB8CD9EDFFFABFAE1CB73990B4FF24